BringOurTroopsHome.US Launches Video, Petition Drive
BringOurTroopsHome.US last week launched an online petition and video urging President Trump to keep his 2016 campaign pledge to bring U.S. troops home from the Middle East, starting with 30,000 National Guard troops the group said should be immediately returned to their home states to help protect Americans from the Chinese corona virus pandemic. (Click to Sign Petition)
Sgt. Dan McKnight, founder of BringOurTroopsHome.US and a U.S. Marine Corps Reserves and active duty Army veteran who served eighteen months in Afghanistan with the Idaho Army National Guard, said he doesn't doubt the sincerity of President Trump's campaign pledge, but said & quote; "the clear and present danger to Americans here at home provides the ultimate justification to finally bring our troops home, and as to timing, should certainly force his hand to keep that promise now."
(Click to Watch Video)
"Thirty thousand. That’s the number of National Guard troops from across America that are deployed outside of the continental United States", McKnight says in the video. "Many of them are fighting in other people’s endless civil wars, trying to play policeman to the world, away from their homes and their families and their jobs, giving their lives to a two-decade old, eight trillion dollar war that is bankrupting America."
"It must end now," he continues in the video. "Because where should these 30,000 American National Guards men and women be? Home. Keeping our neighborhoods and communities safe. Delivering emergency food, water, and medical care. Building testing stations and temporary health care facilities. Guarding our hospitals, our food, and our medical supplies. Putting America first. Putting our people first. Sign our petition at www.BringOurTroopsHome.US. Tell President
Trump to bring our 30,000 National Guard troops home now."
McKnight said the video promoting the group's petition drive will be e-mailed to 13,000 media outlets nationwide, over 10,000 members and staff of Congress, over 5,000 state legislators, and thousands more Americans who have already contacted BringOurTroopsHome.US to express support since the group's founding a year ago. It will also be distributed by Facebook advertising and other social media.
What You Can Do This Week, Right Now:
Call your Governor’s office and urge him to ask President Trump to immediately bring all National Guard troops from your state home to help respond to the the coronavirus threat.
Call your state representative and state senator and urge them to issue a news release calling on your governor to ask President to immediately bring your National Guard troops home.
(Click to Watch Video)
"Thirty thousand. That’s the number of National Guard troops from across America that are deployed outside of the continental United States", McKnight says in the video. "Many of them are fighting in other people’s endless civil wars, trying to play policeman to the world, away from their homes and their families and their jobs, giving their lives to a two-decade old, eight trillion dollar war that is bankrupting America."
"It must end now," he continues in the video. "Because where should these 30,000 American National Guards men and women be? Home. Keeping our neighborhoods and communities safe. Delivering emergency food, water, and medical care. Building testing stations and temporary health care facilities. Guarding our hospitals, our food, and our medical supplies. Putting America first. Putting our people first. Sign our petition at www.BringOurTroopsHome.US. Tell President
Trump to bring our 30,000 National Guard troops home now."
McKnight said the video promoting the group's petition drive will be e-mailed to 13,000 media outlets nationwide, over 10,000 members and staff of Congress, over 5,000 state legislators, and thousands more Americans who have already contacted BringOurTroopsHome.US to express support since the group's founding a year ago. It will also be distributed by Facebook advertising and other social media.
What You Can Do This Week, Right Now:
Call your Governor’s office and urge him to ask President Trump to immediately bring all National Guard troops from your state home to help respond to the the coronavirus threat.
Call your state representative and state senator and urge them to issue a news release calling on your governor to ask President to immediately bring your National Guard troops home.
BringOurTroopsHome.US Releases New Poll in Key Swing States
BringOurTroopsHome.US chairman Sgt. Dan McKnight said bringing U.S. troops home to help fight the growing public health pandemic "is not only the right thing to do for Americans' public health and safety, but something President Trump's base expects of him if he expects to be reelected."
The veterans group last Monday released a new poll (read news release) by the respected Tarrance Group, which found that among Trump supporters in three key, previously Democratic "blue wall" swing states -- Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, which gave Trump the White House in 2016 -- 86 percent support the President's withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria, 62 percent support withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan, and 58 percent support withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.
McKnight said the poll seems to validate a 2017 study (read study) by Boston University and the University of Minnesota, which concluded that Trump's pledge as a candidate to bring U.S. troops home was key to his winning the three Midwestern swing states, where researchers found "a significant and meaningful relationship between a community’s rate of military sacrifice and its support for Trump."
"Our statistical model suggests that if three states key to Trump’s victory – Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin – had suffered even a modestly lower casualty rate, all three could have flipped from red to blue and sent Hillary Clinton to the White House," the study concluded. "If Trump wants to win again in 2020, his electoral fate may well rest on the administration’s approach to the human costs of war."
A YouGov poll (read poll) in January found that nearly 70 percent of all Americans also support withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Iraq.
Idaho House Joins West Virginia in Urging Congress: Declare War Before Deploying National Guard
The Idaho House of Representatives, in the midst of a public health crisis in which America's military forces are being increasingly called on to support civilian response to the coronavirus pandemic, Friday adopted a resolution urging Congress in the future to formally declare war before taking Idaho National Guard troops away from the state for deployment to combat duty overseas.
Floor sponsor Rep. Joe Palmer, R-Meridian, a former member of the Idaho National Guard, said the resolution was intended to demonstrate legislative support both for Idaho's National Guard personnel and the U.S. Constitution's clear assignment of war powers to the U.S. Congress.
"We urge the Congress of the United States, in the future, to fulfill its Constitutionally-prescribed duty to approve a declaration of war before the Idaho National Guard is deployed to combat operations on foreign soil," the resolution stated. (Read Resolution)
The resolution was the result of efforts by BringOurTroopsHome.US, led by Sgt. Dan McKnight, a constituent of Palmer’s.
McKnight praised Idaho lawmakers for "recognizing a growing public demand to bring our troops home, and in the future, not to send them back into foreign combat unless Congress has first reassumed the Constitutional responsibility to declare war, a Constitutional duty and power the Congress for far too long has abdicated to the executive branch of our federal government."
The Idaho House is the second legislative body in recent weeks to adopt a similar resolution. Earlier this month, the West Virginia House of Delegates adopted a resolution rebuking Congress for shirking its Constitutional duty to declare war before U.S. troops are committed to combat overseas, and threatening that the state may refuse future federal orders to deploy its National Guard units to fight in such wars. (See Resolution)
Del. Pat McGeehan, R-Hancock, a U.S. Air Force Academy graduate, Afghanistan war veteran, and West Virginia spokesman for BringOurTroopsHome.US, said that "before approving the Declaration of Independence, our founding fathers first sent resolutions to King George, believing they should at least try to convince the British government to stop violating the rights of American colonists."
"I applaud my House colleagues for taking a similar first step now," McGeehan said, "urging Congress to stop shirking its war powers duties under the Constitution and asserting that if they don't, West Virginia has the right to refuse future federal orders we judge to be in violation of the Constitution, such as sending our National Guard troops to fight in foreign wars without a Congressional declaration of war."
McGeehan earlier this year had introduced bipartisan legislation to give such policy the force of law, requiring that West Virginia's National Guard troops could not be deployed to foreign conflicts unless Congress had first declared war.
The legislation won support from both ends of the political spectrum, including endorsements by the national chairman of Vets for Trump and by the West Virginia ACLU. It was approved by the House Veterans Affairs Committee in February by a vote of 15-7, but stalled in the House Judiciary Committee, whose members preferred to try communicating the Legislature's sentiments to Congress first by resolution.
The resulting House Concurrent Resolution 141 was adopted by the full House by voice vote, urging that in the future, President Trump and Congress "take no action to employ military forces of the United States in active duty combat unless and until the U.S. Congress has passed an official declaration of war," and end the practice of deploying U.S. troops to foreign combat under so-called "blank check" Authorizations of Military Force (AUMFs) that have no expiration date or limits on U.S. military activity.
The resolution also urged the President and Congress "to explicitly execute a coherent and effectively resourced national security strategy" and "to end any periods of endless or perpetual armed conflict with no clear conditions of conclusion that risks the lives of our military members."
McGeehan noted that U.S. troops have been at war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and multiple other African and Middle Eastern countries for nearly a generation based on an AUMF adopted by Congress nearly two decades ago, immediately following the Islamic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which means that all new members of Congress elected in the two decades since never cast a vote on whether to initially authorize such military action.
The resolution quoted founding fathers and framers of the U.S. Constitution -- former Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, and former Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton -- who stated that under the Constitution, only Congress has the authority to declare war, and that the framers intended Congress be required to do so before U.S. troops are sent to fight in foreign conflicts.
"In spite of the clear language of the U.S. Constitution vesting the power over war exclusively in the U.S. Congress," the West Virginia resolution stated, "the U.S. executive branch has unconstitutionally assumed that power while the U.S. Congress has abdicated its Constitutional duty."
"Although the U.S. Congress has not declared war in over 70 years," the resolution continued, "the nation has since gone to war repeatedly at the direction of the executive branch and/or acted under perpetual authorizations to use military force passed by Congress empowering the executive branch to engage in unending war, clearly not what the Founding Fathers intended in the Constitution."
In response to such federal actions, the West Virginia resolution included what amounts to a threat that in the future, West Virginia officials may refuse to comply with federal orders -- such as refusing to allow the state's National Guard units to be mobilized by the federal government for foreign combat -- asserting that "when such unconstitutional actions are taken by the federal government, it is the proper role of the states themselves to take action to remedy such situations, as outlined in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798."
Those early American resolutions -- the first authored by President Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, and the latter by James Madison, often called "The Father of the Constitution" -- were adopted by the Kentucky and Virginia state legislatures, respectively, immediately after the U.S. Constitution was ratified by the newly-formed United States, declaring that states are free under the Constitution to refuse to obey federal laws that state lawmakers judge to be unconstitutional.
McGeehan said he believes West Virginians would support the state making good on its threat to refuse federal orders mobilizing state National Guard personnel to overseas war unless Congress has first fulfilled its Constitutional duty to declare war, citing a Politico poll last year which found that 81 percent of those who voted for President Trump in 2016 supported his efforts to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
And McKnight cited a poll this past January which found that 70 percent of all Americans also support withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
But McKnight said the two resolutions approved by lawmakers in strongly Republican states in particular -- the Idaho House counts 56 Republicans and 14 Democrats, and the West Virginia House, 58 Republicans and 41 Democrats -- is a sign of growing support on the right for ending the two-decade old Bush-Cheney policy, continued under President Obama, of trying unsuccessfully to export Western style democracy to Islamic countries.
The veterans group last Monday released a new poll (read news release) by the respected Tarrance Group, which found that among Trump supporters in three key, previously Democratic "blue wall" swing states -- Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, which gave Trump the White House in 2016 -- 86 percent support the President's withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria, 62 percent support withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan, and 58 percent support withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.
McKnight said the poll seems to validate a 2017 study (read study) by Boston University and the University of Minnesota, which concluded that Trump's pledge as a candidate to bring U.S. troops home was key to his winning the three Midwestern swing states, where researchers found "a significant and meaningful relationship between a community’s rate of military sacrifice and its support for Trump."
"Our statistical model suggests that if three states key to Trump’s victory – Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin – had suffered even a modestly lower casualty rate, all three could have flipped from red to blue and sent Hillary Clinton to the White House," the study concluded. "If Trump wants to win again in 2020, his electoral fate may well rest on the administration’s approach to the human costs of war."
A YouGov poll (read poll) in January found that nearly 70 percent of all Americans also support withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Iraq.
Idaho House Joins West Virginia in Urging Congress: Declare War Before Deploying National Guard
The Idaho House of Representatives, in the midst of a public health crisis in which America's military forces are being increasingly called on to support civilian response to the coronavirus pandemic, Friday adopted a resolution urging Congress in the future to formally declare war before taking Idaho National Guard troops away from the state for deployment to combat duty overseas.
Floor sponsor Rep. Joe Palmer, R-Meridian, a former member of the Idaho National Guard, said the resolution was intended to demonstrate legislative support both for Idaho's National Guard personnel and the U.S. Constitution's clear assignment of war powers to the U.S. Congress.
"We urge the Congress of the United States, in the future, to fulfill its Constitutionally-prescribed duty to approve a declaration of war before the Idaho National Guard is deployed to combat operations on foreign soil," the resolution stated. (Read Resolution)
The resolution was the result of efforts by BringOurTroopsHome.US, led by Sgt. Dan McKnight, a constituent of Palmer’s.
McKnight praised Idaho lawmakers for "recognizing a growing public demand to bring our troops home, and in the future, not to send them back into foreign combat unless Congress has first reassumed the Constitutional responsibility to declare war, a Constitutional duty and power the Congress for far too long has abdicated to the executive branch of our federal government."
The Idaho House is the second legislative body in recent weeks to adopt a similar resolution. Earlier this month, the West Virginia House of Delegates adopted a resolution rebuking Congress for shirking its Constitutional duty to declare war before U.S. troops are committed to combat overseas, and threatening that the state may refuse future federal orders to deploy its National Guard units to fight in such wars. (See Resolution)
Del. Pat McGeehan, R-Hancock, a U.S. Air Force Academy graduate, Afghanistan war veteran, and West Virginia spokesman for BringOurTroopsHome.US, said that "before approving the Declaration of Independence, our founding fathers first sent resolutions to King George, believing they should at least try to convince the British government to stop violating the rights of American colonists."
"I applaud my House colleagues for taking a similar first step now," McGeehan said, "urging Congress to stop shirking its war powers duties under the Constitution and asserting that if they don't, West Virginia has the right to refuse future federal orders we judge to be in violation of the Constitution, such as sending our National Guard troops to fight in foreign wars without a Congressional declaration of war."
McGeehan earlier this year had introduced bipartisan legislation to give such policy the force of law, requiring that West Virginia's National Guard troops could not be deployed to foreign conflicts unless Congress had first declared war.
The legislation won support from both ends of the political spectrum, including endorsements by the national chairman of Vets for Trump and by the West Virginia ACLU. It was approved by the House Veterans Affairs Committee in February by a vote of 15-7, but stalled in the House Judiciary Committee, whose members preferred to try communicating the Legislature's sentiments to Congress first by resolution.
The resulting House Concurrent Resolution 141 was adopted by the full House by voice vote, urging that in the future, President Trump and Congress "take no action to employ military forces of the United States in active duty combat unless and until the U.S. Congress has passed an official declaration of war," and end the practice of deploying U.S. troops to foreign combat under so-called "blank check" Authorizations of Military Force (AUMFs) that have no expiration date or limits on U.S. military activity.
The resolution also urged the President and Congress "to explicitly execute a coherent and effectively resourced national security strategy" and "to end any periods of endless or perpetual armed conflict with no clear conditions of conclusion that risks the lives of our military members."
McGeehan noted that U.S. troops have been at war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and multiple other African and Middle Eastern countries for nearly a generation based on an AUMF adopted by Congress nearly two decades ago, immediately following the Islamic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which means that all new members of Congress elected in the two decades since never cast a vote on whether to initially authorize such military action.
The resolution quoted founding fathers and framers of the U.S. Constitution -- former Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, and former Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton -- who stated that under the Constitution, only Congress has the authority to declare war, and that the framers intended Congress be required to do so before U.S. troops are sent to fight in foreign conflicts.
"In spite of the clear language of the U.S. Constitution vesting the power over war exclusively in the U.S. Congress," the West Virginia resolution stated, "the U.S. executive branch has unconstitutionally assumed that power while the U.S. Congress has abdicated its Constitutional duty."
"Although the U.S. Congress has not declared war in over 70 years," the resolution continued, "the nation has since gone to war repeatedly at the direction of the executive branch and/or acted under perpetual authorizations to use military force passed by Congress empowering the executive branch to engage in unending war, clearly not what the Founding Fathers intended in the Constitution."
In response to such federal actions, the West Virginia resolution included what amounts to a threat that in the future, West Virginia officials may refuse to comply with federal orders -- such as refusing to allow the state's National Guard units to be mobilized by the federal government for foreign combat -- asserting that "when such unconstitutional actions are taken by the federal government, it is the proper role of the states themselves to take action to remedy such situations, as outlined in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798."
Those early American resolutions -- the first authored by President Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, and the latter by James Madison, often called "The Father of the Constitution" -- were adopted by the Kentucky and Virginia state legislatures, respectively, immediately after the U.S. Constitution was ratified by the newly-formed United States, declaring that states are free under the Constitution to refuse to obey federal laws that state lawmakers judge to be unconstitutional.
McGeehan said he believes West Virginians would support the state making good on its threat to refuse federal orders mobilizing state National Guard personnel to overseas war unless Congress has first fulfilled its Constitutional duty to declare war, citing a Politico poll last year which found that 81 percent of those who voted for President Trump in 2016 supported his efforts to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
And McKnight cited a poll this past January which found that 70 percent of all Americans also support withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
But McKnight said the two resolutions approved by lawmakers in strongly Republican states in particular -- the Idaho House counts 56 Republicans and 14 Democrats, and the West Virginia House, 58 Republicans and 41 Democrats -- is a sign of growing support on the right for ending the two-decade old Bush-Cheney policy, continued under President Obama, of trying unsuccessfully to export Western style democracy to Islamic countries.
###
For more information: BringOurTroopsHome.US
